and one of class and been rated in the top 10 for the past decade or so?
Since when 36 is old?
-
Westdem
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
Dat 36 year old is de best WI had since Lara retired...he listened and go against his teammates on numerous occasions and now dem dumb fcuks at factory road ready to kick de man to de curb....whatever de outcome is, I like de gutso he is showing...de man gats ballz!!!Googley wrote:for a batsman?
and one of class and been rated in the top 10 for the past decade or so?
-
Westdem
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
What does Lloyd and Shiv have in common....dem nah want to see or dem can't accept de fact dat we Muddies prepare our players to have a long and sustained career on the international scene....Clive Lloyd played til 40+ in both Test and ODIs.
The only time dat does get cut short is due to BACKSTABBING that goes on....Hoops and Kalli are two known victims of dat....
-
BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
-
mikesiva
- Posts: 19320
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
- Contact:
Another comment that comes off the top of your head....AFRO wrote:It's ok if said batsman is IN FORM and is holding down his place in the team on merit, but i know a certain 36 year old who is just LIVING OFF PAST GLORIES!!
When picking a Test side, you need to look at how the batsmen perform in the Tests, and Shiv was one of our best batsmen in the six Tests that the Windies played in 2010. That's the main criteria, not some pointless off-the-cuff remark.
If there are better Test batsmen than Shiv out there, then they should play ahead of Shiv. But until those batsmen come to the fore, Shiv stays in the team....
-
AFRO
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
Oh look Mike's defending his fellow pensioner again i see!!mikesiva wrote:Another comment that comes off the top of your head....AFRO wrote:It's ok if said batsman is IN FORM and is holding down his place in the team on merit, but i know a certain 36 year old who is just LIVING OFF PAST GLORIES!!
When picking a Test side, you need to look at how the batsmen perform in the Tests, and Shiv was one of our best batsmen in the six Tests that the Windies played in 2010. That's the main criteria, not some pointless off-the-cuff remark.
If there are better Test batsmen than Shiv out there, then they should play ahead of Shiv. But until those batsmen come to the fore, Shiv stays in the team....
, firstly SHIV WAS GARBAGE IN THE SL TEST SERIES, secondly DARREN, SAMUELS, SARWAN AND BARATH never played the same amount of Tests as Shiv did in 2010 THEREFORE SHIV'S ONLY COMPETITION WAS GAYLE AND NASH, FACT!!!.. i keep telling you but clearly you're either having problems comprehending simple english or you're just biased and can't accept the truth, either way those are the facts, lastly Sarwan is more than capable of replacing Shiv, but no doubt you'll run away and make more excuses!!.