Revisiting Stanford One More Time

West Indies cricket discussions
User avatar
badpepper
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:03 am

Unread post

User avatar
Googley
Posts: 5465
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 1:05 pm

Unread post

"I was a part of the Stanford set-up for a number of years, and the money he put into West Indies cricket, it's a great loss," Roberts added
It was more than the money, Andy!

The WI team under Sandford played like professionals while the same team, with the exception of a few, under WICB played like school boys!

Sandford knew how to get the right people involved so the team can perform at max.
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

Curtly summed it up nicely here.. A man who hardly talks to the media.
"He left a big hole, to be honest," said Ambrose. "The excitement was coming back, the fans were coming out, it was a stepping stone, and you were starting to see a resurgence in West Indies cricket. That was through Stanford. He had the money, he had a plan and it was working. But we all know what happened next."

"Since he left the scene, West Indies cricket has gone back to the way it was, and nothing is happening at the moment," said Ambrose. "It is really, really sad to see what has happened, and the cricket gets worse every day, with the board's impasse with WIPA. If we love cricket the way we say we do, and it was one of the reasons why we got involved [as ambassadors], we'll find a way to bring West Indies cricket back to a certain level."
Westdem
Posts: 4025
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm

Unread post

The WI team under Sandford played like professionals while the same team, with the exception of a few, under WICB played like school boys!
They nat only played like professionals, they were expected to have the discipline of professionals...see Xavier as an example of how he was WEEDED off that Stanford team.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
badpepper
Posts: 1192
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:03 am

Unread post

Westdem wrote:
The WI team under Sandford played like professionals while the same team, with the exception of a few, under WICB played like school boys!
They nat only played like professionals, they were expected to have the discipline of professionals...see Xavier as an example of how he was WEEDED off that Stanford team.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
And look at the great discipline Gayle demonstrated in the carpark.
Westdem
Posts: 4025
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm

Unread post

And look at the great discipline Gayle demonstrated in the carpark.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

That was a clause in CG personal contract with Stanford and yes he was paid extra fuh dat....both in flesh and Non Invested Cash.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

Westdem wrote:
The WI team under Sandford played like professionals while the same team, with the exception of a few, under WICB played like school boys!
They nat only played like professionals, they were expected to have the discipline of professionals...see Xavier as an example of how he was WEEDED off that Stanford team.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
you ain't easy bro... :) Tonito Willet was weeded out as well according to reports.
Westdem
Posts: 4025
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm

Unread post

you ain't easy bro... Tonito Willet was weeded out as well according to reports.
Too bad Morton was injured otherwise the Stanford Superstars would have had to forefeit that 20M to the Poms.... :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
BallOil
Posts: 19409
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm

Unread post

talk about blowing good opportunities to make some quick bucks :(

BTW, who were the guys that reinvested their earnings with Stanford?
User avatar
howzdat
Posts: 3507
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:15 am

Unread post

Am really happy that badpepper has presented the chance for us to revisit this topc because I have long wanted to explore some thoughts I had about the game itself and some of the wider issues.

Like Googley, I saw a well prepared, exceptionally focussed and professional team take to the field for that game. From the player's demeanour it was clear that they were a tight-knit unit with no slackers in the squad! From the very first ball it was plain to see that there was no way that England was going to win that game. None! And I was damned proud of them!

Whatever was done during the preparation for that game should have been learnt from and every effort made to emulate it. If WI can prepare that way and muster the same spirit and deliver the necessary standard of performance to WIN, it will not be long before they, aka WE, are at the top of the tree in ALL formats of the game!

Yes the swagger was there - and it was all the sweeter to observe as a spectator because it was backed-up by a performance. England was shell-shocked during that game and they didn't like it one bit. They thought they would fly in, play a game and collect a million - but they didn't reckon for Sir Stanford's professional approach to managing a project that would bear his name. And the player's were supremely confident because they knew that they had covered all bases during preparation.

Afterwards, to hear Kevin Peterson talk about how great it was to observe the delight on the faces of the WI players who had come into a massive fortune - otherwise beyond their capability - on the back of winning one game will remain in my memory as one of the most condescending and insulting remarks to have ever been uttered by a sportsman! Implicit in those comments of his is the suggestion that to the England players winning a million was no big deal. Hah! No big deal my ass -who does he think he is kidding?!

I does get fecking vex everytime I remember those remarks of his and every other comment in the English press that seeks to paint Sir Standford as nothing more than a crook. The fact of the matter is that on that night the England team got a good fecking cricket hiding - and it made me feel damned good! And it reminds me just what is possible from those players with the right leadership and preparation.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Last edited by howzdat on Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:52 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Post Reply