yu not reading me and croft fully, accurately. you doh like gibbo! yuh bias, even if yuh bias now appears consistent with the truth of Gibbos quality as a coach.BallOil wrote:How am I bias when it comes to Gibbo...? Man, tell me which is a LIE that Croft wrote about him? We are so easy on our own players, countrymen, etc that we just accept mediocrity. Now mediocrity is part of the culture. You think I'm lying ? Explain to me why we have players such as Sammy, Smith, Bravo et al cementing their place on this team?
I just hear the coach said they can't be complacent...![]()
![]()
is Gibson for real? Tell me or ask your GREAT coach what his team has done lately so they can't afford to be complacent now...
I have not paid dat much atention to him. but crofts argument is not all that hot. if playing success is THE arbiter of quality coaching why isnt he croft coaching?
if he needs to read and regurgitate to get a coaching paper why not. maybe he is the one to lead a reclamation of westindian cfricket glory?
but that clearly is not crofts intention from the way he talks. croft intends to stay in his ivory tower and chat shit forever
a quality coach is a quality coach and he may or may not have been a great player to have the magic of a great coach. so croft by injecting a comparison between he and gibbo does no service to anyone, he just displays for all to see his own insecutiry.
as an interested, concerned and committed analyst, a westindian dealing with westindian problems, full of the very experience he boasts about... dont you want somethng far more useful, better, from croft that dat diatribe above?
how come he does not demand of himself as a journalist, analyst, writer, the same excellence he demands from the westindian team?
you bally shud not only want soemthing better from croft but expect it. since he he is holding people to high levels, boasts he had a high level himself but he does not display a high level in that article linked above