Page 2 of 2
Re: Jala Defending WICB on cricinfo
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:22 pm
by jala
mikesiva wrote:The solution is not to pick Sammy as captain, and then pick the team....
On the contrary, pick the teams first, and then pick the captain from them.
That's how they did it in the old days....
Can Sammy make either the ODI side or the Test team on merit?
Sir, your argument can only contain a volatile liquid in a sieve.....
In 2010, Sammy had the following stats:
- 12 132 47* 33.00 0 16 4/26 24.87
the fact is, when he was elected captain he would have earned his place in the ODI team on
MERIT!
Re: Jala Defending WICB on cricinfo
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:34 pm
by Westdem
Sir, your argument can only contain a volatile liquid in a sieve.....
In 2010, Sammy had the following stats:
- 12 132 47* 33.00 0 16 4/26 24.87
Suh Sammy's 2010 stats of 33 batting and 24.87 bowling in 12 ODI's against Ireland,Canada, Zimb and SA qualified him to Captain de WI team...Cmon Jala even you I think have higher standard than that!!!
Re: Jala Defending WICB on cricinfo
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:38 am
by mikesiva
Those stats do not qualify Sammy as a player who should make the XI on merit....
Re: Jala Defending WICB on cricinfo
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:13 am
by jala
was Sammy a playing/performing member of the ODI team in 2010?
Re: Jala Defending WICB on cricinfo
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:56 am
by Huckle
was Sammy's appointment a premature ejaculation from the board?