Why it has to be someone on the winning side? What is the goal of the MOM award?Googley wrote:I agree bally, Ajmal was the most impressive of all the bowlers.BallOil wrote:looking at the overall numbers in the game despite the result...
Ajmal was the player of the game! He took a 5/69 in the 1st innings and 6/42 in the 2nd. A match haul of 11/111. That is more than half of the wickets for Pak. IMPRESSIVE!
However, if you have to pick someone from the winning side...why not Ravi? first over, 2 wickets....If Pak had a good start WI would have been weeping rain today!
MOM
-
BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
-
BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
I think this was the original goal for this award but somewhere dung the like it shift to the winning side. why?Googley wrote:I don't agree that it has to be someone from the winning side...for me, the mom should go to the best player in the game, period.
-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
yu have a point jaja. one fuh de fus' time dat i see here. there is always a first I guess 
wat de rass googs and bally goin' orn so for. westindies won. the right man won the MOM! dize how deh have always done in test cricket...the winning side gets the MOM
wat is this now with all the recrimination and review of the process..jess because Sammy won it?
come on guys! give it up! if allyuh want to change the way the MOM is awarded make a case with the ICC. I wud even help put the case together.
but its no big deal MOM and the how of it! I have no idea wat allyuh 2 are on about with this!
wat de rass googs and bally goin' orn so for. westindies won. the right man won the MOM! dize how deh have always done in test cricket...the winning side gets the MOM
wat is this now with all the recrimination and review of the process..jess because Sammy won it?
come on guys! give it up! if allyuh want to change the way the MOM is awarded make a case with the ICC. I wud even help put the case together.
but its no big deal MOM and the how of it! I have no idea wat allyuh 2 are on about with this!
-
BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
this is NOT about Sammy.. He won it! I didn't say anything about Sammy or his award. We talking MOM generally.mapoui wrote:yu have a point jaja. one fuh de fus' time dat i see here. there is always a first I guess
wat de rass googs and bally goin' orn so for. westindies won. the right man won the MOM! dize how deh have always done in test cricket...the winning side gets the MOM
wat is this now with all the recrimination and review of the process..jess because Sammy won it?
come on guys! give it up! if allyuh want to change the way the MOM is awarded make a case with the ICC. I wud even help put the case together.
but its no big deal MOM and the how of it! I have no idea wat allyuh 2 are on about with this!
how often do we see a 10 or more wickets haul in test cricket?
