Page 13 of 13

Re: Pollard v. T&T

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:43 pm
by AFRO
Me heart break fi dem but i'm just happy that some of these young players are getting vital experience, Barath, Darren Bravo and Narine will be playing for WI for years to come, believe me on that, really what cost T&T was the miss field when the ball beat two men and went for four, i knew it wasn't gonna be their day after that mess up, it's ironic though because if they had Polly in their team instead of Ganga they would have won the game easily imo, their 5th bowlers just isn't good enough so hopefully emrit will come in for Mohammed or Sherwin for the next match.

Re: Pollard v. T&T

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:04 pm
by Westdem
AFRO wrote:Me heart break fi dem but i'm just happy that some of these young players are getting vital experience, Barath, Darren Bravo and Narine will be playing for WI for years to come, believe me on that, really what cost T&T was the miss field when the ball beat two men and went for four, i knew it wasn't gonna be their day after that mess up, it's ironic though because if they had Polly in their team instead of Ganga they would have won the game easily imo, their 5th bowlers just isn't good enough so hopefully emrit will come in for Mohammed or Sherwin for the next match.
Me expect better from yuh....TnT did not lose because of bowling, they lost because of batting...It was the great work by the bowlers that mek the game as close as it was...that being said... after a team was 52/2 off the fuss six overs, dem got bowled out fuh 98 in 16.2....check where the real problem is? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Pollard v. T&T

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:22 pm
by BallOil
Spot on WestDem... Mo also made some vital runs and Sherwin played a part with the ball. I think they should stick with this same team...

Re: Pollard v. T&T

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:28 pm
by Westdem
BallOil wrote:Spot on WestDem... Mo also made some vital runs and Sherwin played a part with the ball. I think they should stick with this same team...
Dats de only way I see them going forward...any changes is fuh a batsman.... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Pollard v. T&T

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:33 pm
by AFRO
Westdem wrote:
Me expect better from yuh....TnT did not lose because of bowling, they lost because of batting...It was the great work by the bowlers that mek the game as close as it was...that being said... after a team was 52/2 off the fuss six overs, dem got bowled out fuh 98 in 16.2....check where the real problem is? :lol: :lol: :lol:
How many long hops did Ganga bowl at vital moments? how many miss fields did they make at the death? :roll: yes the bowlers did a brilliant job, but really those bowlers were Rampaul, Badree and Narine, Cooper was ok and Ganga was expensive at the end of the day.

Re: Pollard v. T&T

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:47 pm
by Westdem
AFRO wrote:
Westdem wrote:
Me expect better from yuh....TnT did not lose because of bowling, they lost because of batting...It was the great work by the bowlers that mek the game as close as it was...that being said... after a team was 52/2 off the fuss six overs, dem got bowled out fuh 98 in 16.2....check where the real problem is? :lol: :lol: :lol:
How many long hops did Ganga bowl at vital moments? how many miss fields did they make at the death? :roll: yes the bowlers did a brilliant job, but really those bowlers were Rampaul, Badree and Narine, Cooper was ok and Ganga was expensive at the end of the day.
Afro - thats nat de fuss time there were misfields at crucial time but thats part of the game...we all know dat, aite! 4 overs fuh 31 runs from yuh 5th bowler is nat bad...imagine yuh lose 8 wickets fuh 46 runs in 10.2 overs in a T20 game and yuh fcuking blaming bowling and a misfield....What yuh think about Simmons run out? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Pollard v. T&T

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:51 pm
by AFRO
Westdem wrote:
Afro - thats nat de fuss time there were misfields at crucial time but thats part of the game...we all know dat, aite! 4 overs fuh 31 runs from yuh 5th bowler is nat bad...imagine yuh lose 8 wickets fuh 46 runs in 10.2 overs in a T20 game and yuh fcuking blaming bowling and a misfield....What yuh think about Simmons run out? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Well Simmons was a fecking disgrace but whats new? i wasn't happy with Darren either because i felt he should have stuck around till the end instead of going for the big shot, the truth is despite the batting collapse Trini had the game in their hands and some foolish fielding and bowling cost them the game, i can understand one misfield but the TWO fielders fumbled the ball was unforgivable!!.. Ian Bishop was going mad in the commentary box to rhatid!! :lol: .

Re: Pollard v. T&T

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:58 pm
by Westdem
Well Simmons was a fecking disgrace but whats new? i wasn't happy with Darren either because i felt he should have stuck around till the end instead of going for the big shot, the truth is despite the batting collapse Trini had the game in their hands and some foolish fielding and bowling cost them the game, i can understand one misfield but the TWO fielders fumbled the ball was unforgivable!!.. Ian Bishop was going mad in the commentary box to rhatid!!
Yuh know why I would nat be tough on Sherwin? He should not be bowling de 20th over I also give his brother a pass in letting him bowl de 20th cause if dat six dat Slinga hit was a four...we would have been singing Sherwin praises... The score was so paltry that the bowlers had no room for errors...if yuh need to know if this is truth, look at what we are discussing as the reasons for losing :lol: :lol:

TnT batting need to step up or else them goose cooked!!! 8-)