West Indies Cricket Fans

BallOil wrote:Do you guys believe is freedom of speech or do you want continue to oppress people?

Freedom of speech is only applicable when its time for them to air their dirty laundry and whine!

mapoui wrote:how has Gibson worked wonders with the bowling attack?

shutting down mercurial Pak when they have already won is 'wonders with the bowling'?
I dont think so!

prior to yesterday westindies cud hardly take 5 wickets in a Pak innings

Erm SO WE DIDN'T MAKE SRI-LANKA FOLLOW ON on their own turf the other day? which is the first time we've done that to an opponant IN OVER 15 YEARS!! , secondly at the world cup we bowled out both India and England for modest scores, plus we bowled out SA for 350 twice in the tests which was a decent effort considering we had no Edwards, Taylor and at one stage no Roach, so downplaying Gibbo's influence on the bowling unit is simply FRIVOLOUS IMO.

jala wrote:Again, who should have been captain at the specific time when Sammy was chosen?....u tell me...what were the options?

Him moan about Sammy but then turn around and refuse an alternative like Nash!! .

AFRO wrote:

mapoui wrote:how has Gibson worked wonders with the bowling attack?

shutting down mercurial Pak when they have already won is 'wonders with the bowling'?
I dont think so!

prior to yesterday westindies cud hardly take 5 wickets in a Pak innings

Erm SO WE DIDN'T MAKE SRI-LANKA FOLLOW ON on their own turf the other day? which is the first time we've done that to an opponant IN OVER 15 YEARS!! , secondly at the world cup we bowled out both India and England for modest scores, plus we bowled out SA for 350 twice in the tests which was a decent effort considering we had no Edwards, Taylor and at one stage no Roach, so downplaying Gibbo's influence on the bowling unit is simply FRIVOLOUS IMO.

ok! I give yu something there! not 'wonders' but something!