Sri Lanka Under-19s 147/8 (46.2 ov)
Sri Lanka Under-19s won by 2 wickets (with 22 balls remaining)
Scorecard
Where is Afro? He seh that West Indies have the best U-19 team...
Sri Lanka U-19s defeated West Indies by 2 wickets
-
AFRO
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
Well i'm very shocked to see the yutes lost!!..HOW THE FECK DEM LOSE WHEN DEH HAD SRI-LANKA 71/8? 
word is the spinners just didn't turn up, all the wickets came from the pacers so they did their jobs, also our batting was not up to it's usual standard either, it's the first game though so lets not get too carried away, we also lost the first game by a narrow margin against Australia and then ended up putting licks pon dem rass, we will play SL again later in the competition and i'm sure the boys will learn from that, that was SL's best efforts, this wasn't ours by a long way.
word is the spinners just didn't turn up, all the wickets came from the pacers so they did their jobs, also our batting was not up to it's usual standard either, it's the first game though so lets not get too carried away, we also lost the first game by a narrow margin against Australia and then ended up putting licks pon dem rass, we will play SL again later in the competition and i'm sure the boys will learn from that, that was SL's best efforts, this wasn't ours by a long way.
Last edited by AFRO on Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Westdem
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
Batting again is the problem....but at 71/8, there is no way that they should lose that game....it looks like KB went fuh de kill with the quick stuff cause the spinners only bowl 9.2 of the 46.2 overs bowled and it backfire....KB is learning though!!!! 
What allyuh think about de India U19 beating off the OZ 167 in 12 overs fuh a 10 wicket win?
What allyuh think about de India U19 beating off the OZ 167 in 12 overs fuh a 10 wicket win?
-
AFRO
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
You mean di spinners barely bowled any overs? what di rass was Brathwaite thinking? 
i know the Asian teams can't handle the short ball which is probably what got us the first 8 wickets but really the spinners are the real match winners in that team, and to under use someone like Amir Khan and Derone Davis is criminal man, this latest news actually gives me more hope now because i honestly thought our spinners had failed us, next up will be Australia and i'd expect us to brush dem aside hopefully, then we will see the big Test against India, beat them then the yutes confidence should be sky high for when dem meet SL again.
i know the Asian teams can't handle the short ball which is probably what got us the first 8 wickets but really the spinners are the real match winners in that team, and to under use someone like Amir Khan and Derone Davis is criminal man, this latest news actually gives me more hope now because i honestly thought our spinners had failed us, next up will be Australia and i'd expect us to brush dem aside hopefully, then we will see the big Test against India, beat them then the yutes confidence should be sky high for when dem meet SL again.-
Westdem
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
I need to see Campbell and KB mek some big scores cause it will do a lot fuh them going forward...AFRO wrote:You mean di spinners barely bowled any overs? what di rass was Brathwaite thinking?
OZ looks like dem send a club team to this tournament!!!
-
BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
the fast bowlers are the only ones to take wickets in this match...AFRO wrote:You mean di spinners barely bowled any overs? what di rass was Brathwaite thinking?
-
BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
mek that 27.... in a match of 93 over, 41 bowled by slow bowlers, all wicketless.Westdem wrote:They bowled 37 of the overs suh its only fair dat they tek all de wickets....the fast bowlers are the only ones to take wickets in this match...
-
Westdem
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
BallOil wrote:mek that 27.... in a match of 93 over, 41 bowled by slow bowlers, all wicketless.Westdem wrote:They bowled 37 of the overs suh its only fair dat they tek all de wickets....the fast bowlers are the only ones to take wickets in this match...
Aite bass....I guess KB did what he did fuh a reason...too bad him and Campbell couldn't mek 50 between them....
