Kudos For Bad Wickets?
-
BallOil
- Posts: 19409
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:12 pm
Maps ..I'v posted this earlierand only Mike responded to it..mapoui wrote:are bad wickets now good for tes cricket....producing tuff situations for batsmen, chance for bowlers and edged results every time?
ICC banned this pitch in 2009 and this is the first match since then...
-
mapoui
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:07 pm
I dont agree! I like this match. it is very interesting a nd a ressult is assured.Googley wrote:ICC should ban it again....but then how come Shiv mek his century?!
players must master all conditions. leave the pitch as it is. leave the westindian ones too. now I see
-
Westdem
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
Agree here...yuh need to get some difficult wicket sometimes....this is de reason we built Providence the way it is....Suh dat 118 from Shiv is like a double ton?mapoui wrote:I dont agree! I like this match. it is very interesting a nd a ressult is assured.Googley wrote:ICC should ban it again....but then how come Shiv mek his century?!
players must master all conditions. leave the pitch as it is. leave the westindian ones too. now I see
-
AFRO
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
When we batted apparently the pitch was a "road", but after we embarrassed India and skittle dem out cheaply the pitch is "bad for batting"? 
can't it just be a case of WE HAVE A GOOD BOWLING ATTACK AND DEM COULDN'T COPE? why does the pitch always have to be an excuse?
can't it just be a case of WE HAVE A GOOD BOWLING ATTACK AND DEM COULDN'T COPE? why does the pitch always have to be an excuse?-
Westdem
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
AFRO wrote:When we batted apparently the pitch was a "road", but after we embarrassed India and skittle dem out cheaply the pitch is "bad for batting"?
Yuh nah see dat the ball wasn't coming on as they predicted....de pitch nat playing true...watch fuh some shooters by day 4...350+ is death of India...
