Well done Non-HPC!!!
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
Suh de rest ah de players are part of the WIPA regime and they got us the win?joshua wrote:HPC players the 6 of you all should be ashamed of yourselves for your generally sub-par performances through the series.Well done to the Non-HPC players for getting us teh win.


-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:39 pm
Westdem
Break down the performances of the 6 HPC players
Chandrika-poor
Corbin-poor
Thomas-poor
Bonner- OK
Permaul- failed to impress
GAbriel- failed to impress
Thats teh majority of the 11. Bowling relied on Pascal and Russell, batting on Hyatt, Carter and Narine in this match and Brathwaite, Russell, Hyatt and Bonner in teh first match.
When we needed the HPC players espescially teh batters to step up they failed to do so at teh crucial times
Break down the performances of the 6 HPC players
Chandrika-poor
Corbin-poor
Thomas-poor
Bonner- OK
Permaul- failed to impress
GAbriel- failed to impress
Thats teh majority of the 11. Bowling relied on Pascal and Russell, batting on Hyatt, Carter and Narine in this match and Brathwaite, Russell, Hyatt and Bonner in teh first match.
When we needed the HPC players espescially teh batters to step up they failed to do so at teh crucial times
- mikesiva
- Posts: 19320
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
- Contact:
Wow, joshua, that's a good breakdown....
I didn't realise that the HPC players were getting such a free ride.
I agree with your classifications, except that I would probably upgrade Gabriel from 'failed to impress' to 'OK'. I mean, he did take six wickets at an average of 25....
But I totally agree with you - as a pace bowler, he was outshone by Russell (14 wkts @ 12) and Pascal (9 wkts @ 21).
I didn't realise that the HPC players were getting such a free ride.
I agree with your classifications, except that I would probably upgrade Gabriel from 'failed to impress' to 'OK'. I mean, he did take six wickets at an average of 25....

But I totally agree with you - as a pace bowler, he was outshone by Russell (14 wkts @ 12) and Pascal (9 wkts @ 21).
-
- Posts: 4025
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:54 pm
I agree but according to AFRO...its nat the performance that matters, its the INTERNATIONAL experience that is the WICB # 1 Priority...joshua wrote:Westdem
Break down the performances of the 6 HPC players
Chandrika-poor
Corbin-poor
Thomas-poor
Bonner- OK
Permaul- failed to impress
GAbriel- failed to impress
Thats teh majority of the 11. Bowling relied on Pascal and Russell, batting on Hyatt, Carter and Narine in this match and Brathwaite, Russell, Hyatt and Bonner in teh first match.
When we needed the HPC players espescially teh batters to step up they failed to do so at teh crucial times



Are yuh not giving Permaul any credit for LEADERSHIP? He sacrificed his bowling for the betterment of the TEAM....and he won the SERIES!!!



-
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
Gabriel took wickets though and Chandrika's knock in the second test was vital in winning the game!!joshua wrote:Westdem
Break down the performances of the 6 HPC players
Chandrika-poor
Corbin-poor
Thomas-poor
Bonner- OK
Permaul- failed to impress
GAbriel- failed to impress
Thats teh majority of the 11. Bowling relied on Pascal and Russell, batting on Hyatt, Carter and Narine in this match and Brathwaite, Russell, Hyatt and Bonner in teh first match.
When we needed the HPC players espescially teh batters to step up they failed to do so at teh crucial times

- mikesiva
- Posts: 19320
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
- Contact:
The stats don't reflect your opinion....AFRO wrote:Gabriel took wickets though and Chandrika's knock in the second test was vital in winning the game!!joshua wrote:Westdem
Break down the performances of the 6 HPC players
Chandrika-poor
Corbin-poor
Thomas-poor
Bonner- OK
Permaul- failed to impress
GAbriel- failed to impress
Thats teh majority of the 11. Bowling relied on Pascal and Russell, batting on Hyatt, Carter and Narine in this match and Brathwaite, Russell, Hyatt and Bonner in teh first match.
When we needed the HPC players espescially teh batters to step up they failed to do so at teh crucial times, the only one's who totally flopped were Corbin and Thomas imo, the others done very well in spells.
1) Danza Hyatt 160 runs @ average of 40 - GOOD
2) Raj Chandrika 70 runs @ 17 - FAIL
3) Kyle Corbin 31 runs @ 17 - FAIL
4) Jonathan Carter 104 runs @ 26 - FAIL
5) Nkrumah Bonner 196 runs @ 49 - GOOD
6) Devon Thomas 8 runs @ 2 - BIG TIME FAIL
7) Andre Russell 147 runs @ 42 and 14 wkts @ 12 -DAMN GOOD
8) Carlo Brathwaite - 90 runs @ 45 and 0 wkts @ 67 - PASS
9) Nelon Pascal - nine wkts @ 21 - GOOD
10) Shannon Gabriel - six wickets @ 25 - PASS
11) Veerasammy Permaul - three wkts @ 40 - FAIL
12) Sunil Narine - 66 runs and two wkts @ 31 - PASS
So, Permaul, Thomas, Corbin, Carter and Chandrika all failed....
Will we see the next A team selected on merit? Or will the usual favouritism towards non-performers from the HPC continue?

-
- Posts: 9502
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 12:44 pm
What the feck do you mean "the facts don't reflect my opinion"? DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT "IN SPELLS" MEANS MIKE?mikesiva wrote:The stats don't reflect your opinion....AFRO wrote:Gabriel took wickets though and Chandrika's knock in the second test was vital in winning the game!!joshua wrote:Westdem
Break down the performances of the 6 HPC players
Chandrika-poor
Corbin-poor
Thomas-poor
Bonner- OK
Permaul- failed to impress
GAbriel- failed to impress
Thats teh majority of the 11. Bowling relied on Pascal and Russell, batting on Hyatt, Carter and Narine in this match and Brathwaite, Russell, Hyatt and Bonner in teh first match.
When we needed the HPC players espescially teh batters to step up they failed to do so at teh crucial times, the only one's who totally flopped were Corbin and Thomas imo, the others done very well in spells.
1) Danza Hyatt 160 runs @ average of 40 - GOOD
2) Raj Chandrika 70 runs @ 17 - FAIL
3) Kyle Corbin 31 runs @ 17 - FAIL
4) Jonathan Carter 104 runs @ 26 - FAIL
5) Nkrumah Bonner 196 runs @ 49 - GOOD
6) Devon Thomas 8 runs @ 2 - BIG TIME FAIL
7) Andre Russell 147 runs @ 42 and 14 wkts @ 12 -DAMN GOOD
8) Carlo Brathwaite - 90 runs @ 45 and 0 wkts @ 67 - PASS
9) Nelon Pascal - nine wkts @ 21 - GOOD
10) Shannon Gabriel - six wickets @ 25 - PASS
11) Veerasammy Permaul - three wkts @ 40 - FAIL
12) Sunil Narine - 66 runs and two wkts @ 31 - PASS
So, Permaul, Thomas, Corbin, Carter and Chandrika all failed....
Will we see the next A team selected on merit? Or will the usual favouritism towards non-performers from the HPC continue?

And if you want to judge things all by stats can you post Sarwan's from the Pakistan and India series please? and then explain why you want him back in the team?

- mikesiva
- Posts: 19320
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 11:30 am
- Location: Watford, Hertfordshire
- Contact:
"In spells" is not good enough, especially for the A team against lowly Bangladesh....
A good knock in one out of four innings against one of the weakest sides in 'Test' cricket is not acceptable.
If they can't perform against Bangladesh, how are they going to fare against A teams from England, Australia, India and South Africa? The five I failed need to go back to domestic cricket, and leave the A team to more deserving players....
A good knock in one out of four innings against one of the weakest sides in 'Test' cricket is not acceptable.
If they can't perform against Bangladesh, how are they going to fare against A teams from England, Australia, India and South Africa? The five I failed need to go back to domestic cricket, and leave the A team to more deserving players....