Page 2 of 3

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 10:32 am
by BallOil
Googley wrote:
BallOil wrote:looking at the overall numbers in the game despite the result...

Ajmal was the player of the game! He took a 5/69 in the 1st innings and 6/42 in the 2nd. A match haul of 11/111. That is more than half of the wickets for Pak. IMPRESSIVE!
I agree bally, Ajmal was the most impressive of all the bowlers.

However, if you have to pick someone from the winning side...why not Ravi? first over, 2 wickets....If Pak had a good start WI would have been weeping rain today!
Why it has to be someone on the winning side? What is the goal of the MOM award?

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 10:33 am
by Googley
I don't agree that it has to be someone from the winning side...for me, the mom should go to the best player in the game, period.

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 10:36 am
by jala
steupssssssss.......people and dem agenda...

we WON THE GAME!!...Who cares! :roll:

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 10:39 am
by BallOil
Googley wrote:I don't agree that it has to be someone from the winning side...for me, the mom should go to the best player in the game, period.
I think this was the original goal for this award but somewhere dung the like it shift to the winning side. why?

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 10:41 am
by BallOil
jala wrote:steupssssssss.......people and dem agenda...

we WON THE GAME!!...Who cares! :roll:
Jala, this is not about one game even though it started so....

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:09 am
by BallOil
how often do we see a 10 or more wickets haul in test cricket?

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:17 am
by mapoui
yu have a point jaja. one fuh de fus' time dat i see here. there is always a first I guess :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

wat de rass googs and bally goin' orn so for. westindies won. the right man won the MOM! dize how deh have always done in test cricket...the winning side gets the MOM

wat is this now with all the recrimination and review of the process..jess because Sammy won it?

come on guys! give it up! if allyuh want to change the way the MOM is awarded make a case with the ICC. I wud even help put the case together.

but its no big deal MOM and the how of it! I have no idea wat allyuh 2 are on about with this!

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:25 am
by BallOil
mapoui wrote:yu have a point jaja. one fuh de fus' time dat i see here. there is always a first I guess :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

wat de rass googs and bally goin' orn so for. westindies won. the right man won the MOM! dize how deh have always done in test cricket...the winning side gets the MOM

wat is this now with all the recrimination and review of the process..jess because Sammy won it?

come on guys! give it up! if allyuh want to change the way the MOM is awarded make a case with the ICC. I wud even help put the case together.

but its no big deal MOM and the how of it! I have no idea wat allyuh 2 are on about with this!
this is NOT about Sammy.. He won it! I didn't say anything about Sammy or his award. We talking MOM generally.

how often do we see a 10 or more wickets haul in test cricket?

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:26 am
by mapoui
is a capitalist world! winner tek all! :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Re: MOM

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:26 am
by Googley
whats the "agenda" Jala?

do you care to explain? or you want to stick to your agenda? :arrow: